However, it is a mistake to think that the C Level Executive List conciliation of the Bolivian nation comes hand in hand with the extirpation of non-indigenous people from political power. In this sense, the decolonization of the indigenous C Level Executive List government, designed to combat the anomaly, has been exercised from the electoral perspective (from the reproduction C Level Executive List of partisan political power) and has resulted in a mechanism of stigmatization and grievance, rather than resolution and consensus. Clearly, to the C Level Executive List pre-existing conjunctions of the relationship between the racial imaginary, which they have associated.
To the Castilian speaker with the political C Level Executive List representation antonym to plurinational, stories of social exclusion of the "white" have been attached to them for the sake of preserving the multiethnic quality of Bolivia. A large part of C Level Executive List of the non-indigenous feel excluded from the plurinational State, which is why they reject it in political socialization because it has not given them constitutionally qualified political representation. Moreover, it has transformed them C Level Executive List into potentially harmful subjects and outsiders in the context of plurinational.
This has practical effects on the sense C Level Executive List of national belonging of the «whites», since their appropriation of the Bolivian nationality came from the practice, both literal and figurative, of historical hoarding. In this context, his feeling C Level Executive List of postcolonial guilt has turned into an awareness of the dislocation of his central role in the history of Bolivia. In other words, in the dilemma of being lost or antisocial, part of them has become a kind of "revolutionaries" (or counterrevolutionaries, as you look at them). Is that why it was C Level Executive List possible that the wealthy classes seem to have been at the forefront and adopted methods of social protest?